Repressed memory accuracy

Many people are sitting in jail for crimes they did not commit because of recovered memory testimony. In order for memories to need to be recovered, they first need to be repressed. Repressed memories are gone. Memories can be suppressed in that a person can try not to think about a horrible thing so that they can function normally in every day life, but a memory can never truly be repressed (the definition of a repressed memory is that the generally negative experience effects a person’s actions/feelings and that the person would not be able to tell someone why they do something or feel a certain way, just that they do.)

‘Repressed memories’ are recovered through the process of hypnosis. Many people, including the justice system of the United States believe that recovered memories are extremely accurate because of the conviction with which people stand by their memories. Sadly, these memories have basically been planted in their heads without their therapist really meaning to plant them. A patient can go to therapy, and if a therapist asks enough or they talk about the possibility enough, anyone will come up with a possible scenario in their head. After talking about the scenario enough, people will actually believe that this event really happened to them.

This phenomenon is especially visible in children. If a child hears a story enough (especially if they are told the story happened to them), they will not remember if it is an actual memory or if it is just the story they have heard so many times. This is where trials turn into witch hunts. Especially in the case of statutory rape/child abuse, many people question children over the time period before trials about what happened, and if they talk about it enough, they can essentially plant memories in the children’s heads.

I’m not saying that all the time people are lying in cases that use repressed memory testimony, just that people don’t suddenly remember terrible ordeals. That is just not how memory works.